Kepimpinan Dan Kecerdasan Emosi Dalam Kalangan Barisan Pengurusan Tertinggi Institut Pengajian Tinggi

Leadership And Emotional Intelligence Among Highest Management Line-Ups In Higher Learning Institution

Authors

  • Tengku Elmi Azlina Tengku Muda UKM
  • Shazarina Zdainal Abidin KUIS
  • Suhana Mohamad Lip KUIS
  • Suziana Hanini Sulaiman KUIS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i2.80

Keywords:

Kecerdasan Emosi, Kepimpinan, Barisan Pengurusan Tertinggi IPT

Abstract

Emotional intelligence and leadership are main aspects in determining a leader’s effective leadership in any organisation. In relation to that matter, this study focuses on emotional intelligence and leadership among the highest management line-ups of a faculty in higher learning institution. This study is a quantitative study involving 59 highest management line-ups of a faculty consist of Dean, Deputy Dean and Head of Department of a faculty from higher learning institution in Selangor. Objectives of this study are to see the profiles of emotional intelligence, leadership profile, as well as to identify the relation between emotional intelligence and leadership among Dean, Deputy Dean and Head of Department. Malaysian Emotional Quotient Inventory – Adult (IKEM-MEQI) by Noriah et. al. (2004) was used to measure emotional intelligence aspect while Malaysian Leadership Audit Trail Inventory- Adult (MLATI) by Noriah-Elmi (2013) was used to measure leadership aspect. The result of this study shows that the level of emotional intelligence among Dean, Deputy Dean and Head of Department of a faculty in a higher learning institution is at a high level (mean = 4.3). Analysis for each emotional intelligence domain also portrays high level. Domain of self awareness (mean = 4.5), empathy (mean = 4.3), self regulation (mean = 4.3), self motivation (mean= 4.1), social skill (mean = 3.9), spiritual (mean = 4.9) and maturity (mean = 4.8). Study also shows leadership profile among Dean, Deputy Dean and Head of Department of faculty in higher learning institution was at high level (mean = 4.2). Analysis for each leadership domain also shows high level. Service strategy and leadership model domain (mean = 4.3), recruit (mean = 4.3), assessment and acknowledgment (mean = 4.8), placement (mean = 4.0), building leadership (mean = 4.2), involvement and preservation (mean = 3.9), relation with authorities (mean = 4.1). Result of the study also shows significant relation between emotional intelligence and leadership among Dean, Deputy Dean and Head of Department of faculty in higher learning institution.

Abstrak

Kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan merupakan aspek utama yang menentukan keberkesanan kepimpinan seseorang pemimpin dimana-mana organisasi. Oleh yang demikian, kajian ini memfokuskan kepada aspek kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan dalam kalangan barisan pengurusan tertinggi fakulti di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Kajian ini adalah berbentuk kajian kuantitatif yang melibatkan 59 orang barisan pengurusan tertinggi fakulti yang terdiri daripada dekan, timbalan dekan dan ketua jabatan fakulti dari institusi pengajian tinggi di Selangor. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk melihat profil kecerdasan emosi, profil kepimpinan serta mengenalpasti hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan dalam kalangan dekan, timbalan dekan dan ketua jabatan. Inventori Kepintaran Emosi Malaysia – Dewasa (IKEM-MEQI) oleh Noriah et. Al (2004) digunakan untuk mengukur aspek kecerdasan emosi manakala Inventori Malaysian Leadership Audit Trail Inventory- Dewasa (MLATI) oleh Noriah-Elmi (2013) digunakan untuk mengukur aspek kepimpinan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan tahap kecerdasan emosi dalam kalangan Dekan, Timbalan Dekan dan Ketua-ketua Jabatan Fakulti di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi adalah di tahap yang tinggi (min 4.3). Analisis bagi setiap domain kecerdasan emosi juga menunjukkan tahap yang tinggi. Domain kesedaran kendiri (min 4.5), empati (min 4.3), regulasi kendiri (min 4.3), motivasi kendiri (min 4.1), kemahiran sosial (min 3.9), kerohanian (min 4.9) dan kematangan (min 4.8). Kajian juga menunjukkan profil kepimpinan dalam kalangan Dekan, Timbalan Dekan dan Ketua-ketua Jabatan Fakulti di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi adalah di tahap yang tinggi (min 4.2). Analisis bagi setiap domain kepimpinan juga menunjukkan tahap yang tinggi. Domain strategi perkhidmatan dan model kepimpinan (min 4.3), rekrut (min 4.3), penilaian dan penghormatan (min 4.8), penempatan (min 4.0), membina kepimpinan (min 4.2), penglibatan dan pengekalan (min 3.9), hubungan dengan pihak berkepentingan (min 4.1). Hasil kajian juga menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara kecerdasan emosi dan kepimpinan dalam kalangan Dekan, Timbalan Dekan dan Ketua-ketua Jabatan Fakulti di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azizi Yahaya, Jaafar Sidek Latif, Shahrin Hashim & Yusof Boon. (2006). Psikologi Sosial Alam Remaja. (2nd ed.) Batu Caves: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., &Walumbwa, F. O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A selfbased model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.

Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership That Get Results. Harvard Business Review, March/Apr 2000, 78(12),78.

Goleman, D. (2001). The emotionally intelligent workplace. New York: Bant

Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong Achievement. Bantam Books, New York.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal Leadership: Realizing The Power Of Emotional Intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Goleman, Daniel. (1998). Working With Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam/ Doubleday/Dell

Hallinger, P. (2012). Assessing and developing instructional leadership in schools. In Shen, J. (Ed). Tools for improving the principalship. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang.

Ioan Pastor ,2014. Leadership and Emotional Intelligence: The Effect on Performance and Attitude, Procedia Economics and Finance Volume 15, 2014, Pages 985-992

Izani Ibrahim. (2013). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosi Pemimpin Terhadap Pengurusan Perubahan di Sekolah. Paper presented in Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Pendidikan Ke 20. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Lisdawati Muda, 2014, Pembentukkan Dan Pengembangan Karakter Dalam Kepemimpinan, Al-Ulum, Volume. 14 Nomor 1, Juni 2014, Hal 109-126

Masaong Abd. Kadim. (2012). Hubungan Kecerdasan Emosional dan Kecerdasan Spiritual dengan Gaya Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri Di Kota Gorontalo. (Tidak diterbitkan)

Mayer, J. D., DiPaolo, M. T., & Salovey, P. (1990). Perceiving Affective Content In Ambiguous Visual Stimuli: A Component Of Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 772-781.

Mayer, J.D. & Salovey, P.1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination,Cognition and personality 9: 185-211.

Mayer, J.D. & Salovey, P.1993. The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence 17: 433-442.

Noraini Misran dan Ahmad Othman, 2011 dalam Siti Arni Basir, Nurul Syafiyah Mohd Noor, Mohamad Zaidi Abd Rahman, Monika @ Munirah Abd Razzak (2016) Peranan Pemimpin dalam Pelaksanaan Etika Kerja Islam: Kajian Kes di Johor Corporation (JCorp), Jurnal Usuluddin 44 (Julai – Disember 2016): 45-83.

Noriah Mohd Ishak. 2005. Kecerdasan emosi: Kompetensi utama di kalangan kaunselor- Satu kemungkinan. Prosiding 2. Seminar Kaunseling Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia Kali Kedua. Hotel City Bayview, Langkawi, Kedah Darul Aman. 30 Mei-2 Jun.

Noriah Mohd Ishak. 2005. Pengurusan kecerdasan emosi (KE) dan pembangunan kendiri pelajar. Seminar pengetuaan kebangsaan. Auditorium Kampus Kota, Universiti Malaya. 11 &12 Mei.

Noriah, M.I. & Nor Shakinah, M. (2003). Pola Pertautan Guru-Pelajar Dan Komitmen Terhadap Profesion Perguruan Di Kalangan Guru-Guru: Satu Kajian Kualitatif. VirTec Journal, 3, 27-44

Noriah, M.I., Ramlee, M., Zuria, M., & Siti Rahayah, A. (2006). Emotional Intelligence Of Malaysian Teachers: Implications On Workplace Productivity. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 14, 7-24

Nurul Hudani Md Nawi., Ma’arof Redzuan., Hanina Hamsan., & Ibrani Adam Asim. (2013). Model Fitness on Emotional Intelligence, Personality Traits and Leadership Behavior on Job Performances. Jurnal Teknologi, 61(1), 47-55.

Ooi Yeng Keat ( 2002) Kepentingan kecerdasan emosi ( EQ) dalam organisasi masa kini. Jelapang, 3(1).pp.45-53

Rosma Ayu Harun, Noriah Ishak & Salleh Amat(2016) Kecerdasan Emosi Sebagai Faktor Penyumbang kepada Kepimpinan Ahli Majlis Eksekutif Pelajar Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Personalia Pelajar 19(1)(2016): 65-74

Tengku Elmi Azlina .2015. Kecerdasan Emosi, Kepimpinan dan Kepuasan Kerja Ketua Guru Bimbingan dan kaunseling Sekolah Menengah. Tesis Dr Falsafah: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Tengku Muda, T. E. A., Zdainal Abidin, S. ., Mohamad Lip, S., & Sulaiman, S. H. (2017). Kepimpinan Dan Kecerdasan Emosi Dalam Kalangan Barisan Pengurusan Tertinggi Institut Pengajian Tinggi: Leadership And Emotional Intelligence Among Highest Management Line-Ups In Higher Learning Institution. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i2.80

Most read articles by the same author(s)