Social Constructivism in Social Media: Facebook For Teaching and Learning Purpose

Konstruktivisme Sosial Dalam Media Sosial: Facebook Untuk Tujuan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran

Authors

  • Mohd Amin Mohd Noh KUIS
  • Hoo Fang Jing KUIS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i2.88

Keywords:

educational technology, social constructivism, social media, online learning

Abstract

This study describes the importance of looking into the theory of constructivism in the process of teaching and learning for higher learning institution in Malaysia. 56 participants from 3 different groups of Art and Design final year students in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Melaka campus have been chosen as the subjects for this study. It investigates how these groups of students are able to construct knowledge based on their prior knowledge, past experiences and the cultural factors that govern the environment they are in to produce good and interesting final year project. Problems arisen in the process of teaching and learning whereby students and lecturers were not able to meet up during lecture and studio hours due to many constrains like absenteeism, meetings, and insufficiency for monitoring and consulting student’s project progress and developments resulting in inefficiency and less productive of the final products by the students. Thus, Social Constructivism is looked into using a well- known Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) tool which is Facebook. The qualitative method is used for collecting data to examine the social interaction and the development of communication among students. The findings in this study indicate that the use of Facebook has served as a good tool for Graphic Design students to achieve better social interaction amongst them in the process of teaching and learning session. Therefore, CMC should be used as an alternative tool for lecturers to be able to communicate with students. Learning process should not be confined only during classroom. Both the students and lecturer should participate in students’ own learning time and to overcome the constraint of face-to- face interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, G. R., & Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1985). Understanding Research Methods. New York: Longman.

Chartier, D. (December 5, 2008). Interview: Facebook engineering VP talks Connect. Ars Technica. Retrieved on April 5, 2014, from http://arstechnica.com/business/2008/12/facebook-connect-interview/.

Chen, I. (2012). Social Constructivism Constructivist Theories. An Electronic Textbook on Instructional Technology. Retrieved on April 5, 2014, from http://viking.coe.uh.edu/~ichen/ebook/et-it/social.htm.

Dean, A. (February, 2009). Facebook. WhatIs.com. Retrieved on May 5, 2014, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/Facebook.

Distribution of Facebook Users Worldwide as of January 2017, by Age and Gender. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/376128/facebook-global-user-age-distribution/

Distribution of Facebook Users Worldwide as of January 2017, by Age and Gender. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/376128/facebook-global-user-age-distribution/

Ernest, P. (March 23, 1999). Social Constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics: Radical Constructivism.

Facebook Product/Service. (February 4, 2004). Facebook. Retrieved on April 5, 2014, from https://www.facebook.com/facebook?sk=info.

Hoo, J. F. J., Nur’ain Mohsin, & Rafidah Abdul Azis. (2011). Gender Roles in Weblog Online Interaction among UiTM Students. Shah Alam, Selangor: Institut Pengurusan Penyelidikan

Keengwe, J., Schnellert, G., & Mills, C. (2012). Laptop initiative: Impact on instructional technology integration and student learning. Education and Information Technologies, 17(2), 137-146.

Kukla, A. (2000). Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

McClard, A., & Anderson, K. (2008). Focus on Facebook: Who Are We Anyway?. Anthropology News. Retrieved on May 5, 2014, from http://www.aaanet.org/issues/anthronews/upload/49-3-McClard-and-Anderson-In-Focus.pdf.

McMahon, M. (1997). Social Constructivism and the World Wide Web - A Paradigm for Learning. Retrieved on May 5, 2014, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/papers/Mcmahon/Mcmahon.html.

Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175-185.

Number of Monthly Active Facebook Users Worldwide as of 1st Quarter 2017 (in Millions). (2017). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/

Pepitone, J. (2010). Facebook Hits 500 Million Users. CNN Money. Retrieved on April 5, 2014, from http://money.cnn.com/2010/07/21/technology/facebook_500_million/index.htm.

Piaget, L. (1957). Construction of Reality in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Protalinski, E. (October 3, 2013). Facebook Passes 1.19 Billion Monthly Active Users, 874 Million Mobile Users, and 728 Million Daily Users. Company/Facebook. Retrieved on May 5, 2014, from http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2013/10/30/facebook-passes-1-19-billion-monthly-active-users-874-million-mobile-users-728-million-daily-users/.

Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). ‘Fitting in’or ‘standing out’: Working‐class students in UK higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 107-124.

Romiszowski, A., & Mason, R. (1996). Computer-Mediated Communication. Handbook Of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 397-431.

Vgotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Interaction Between Learning and Development (pp. 79-91), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Mohd Noh, M. A., & Jing, H. F. (2017). Social Constructivism in Social Media: Facebook For Teaching and Learning Purpose: Konstruktivisme Sosial Dalam Media Sosial: Facebook Untuk Tujuan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 1(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i2.88

Most read articles by the same author(s)